Review Guidelines

PGJSRT strictly adheres to the double-masked peer review process to ensure the anonymity of reviewers and authors and to avoid bias during the review process. The PGJSRT technical team should send the standard Peer Review Evaluation Form and the article to the respective peer reviewer, who is considered an expert in the field, for review.

It is the responsibility of the peer reviewer to provide substantial comments and suggestions to improve the paper and maintain the quality of the research article to be published by the PGJSRT. The reviewer shall evaluate the general content in terms of the research paper's academic significance, contribution to the community, technical novelty, quality of information, and language usage. In terms of specific content, the reviewer evaluates the accuracy and unity of the information in the abstract, the relevance of the introduction, literature, and studies to the topic, the coherence of the objectives, the precision of the methods used, the completeness of the results and discussion, the comprehensiveness of the conclusion, and the thoroughness of the reference list. The research article sent to a peer reviewer, considered an expert in the field, should decide whether to publish without revision, accept after revision, or reject it. If one of them decides to reject the paper and the other decides to accept it, this is the only time the paper should undergo another review and be sent to the third reviewer.