Development, validation, and utilization of localized sensory board for learners with special educational needs

Authors

  • Sammy Boy B. Guzman Kasiglahan Village Elementary School, Department of Education, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58429/pgjsrt.v4n1a209

Abstract

This study aimed to develop, validate, and utilize a localized sensory board for Learners with Special Educational Needs (LSENs). A mixed-methods research design was used to systematically develop, validate, and utilize the localized sensory board. The respondents and participants of this study were twenty-two LSENs and twenty-two parents of LSENs. A random sampling procedure was used to select twenty-two LSENs and twenty-two parents. The data were collected through document analysis, validation rubric, and interviews. Based on the findings of the study, the following results were drawn: 1) The academic performance of LSENs before the utilization of the sensory board were at the following markings: 22.73% at Approaching Proficiency, 50.00% at Developing, and 27.27% at Beginning, 2) The experts in special education validated the material as highly acceptable to the following dimensions: Quality, Usability, and Technical Design, 3) The academic performance of LSENs after the utilization of the sensory board were at the following markings: 63.64% at Approaching Proficiency, and 36.36% at Developing, 4) Based on the responses of the parents, the impacts of using the localized sensory board are as follows: motivates students to learn, develops mathematics and numeracy skills, serves as transition activity, functions as supplementary activity, encourages calming activity, and functions as manipulative material, and 5) The results of the sample t-test revealed that there is significant difference between the academic performance of the students before and after the utilization of the localized sensory board at a very high level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ayeres, A. (1972) Sensory Integration and the Child. Los Angeles, CA: WPA. https://sensoryproject.org/app/uploads/2021/06/SISIS1298.pdf

Buchner, T., Fortuna, J., & Lindsay N. (2014). Sensory Integration Interventions Used by Pediatric

Occupational Therapists for Children Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review. Occupational Therapy Graduate Research.

https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/ot_pediatrics/4

Critz, C., Blake, K., & Nogueira, E. (2015). Sensory processing challenges in children. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 11(7), 710–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2015.04.016

Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-Methods Research: A Discussion on its Types, Challenges, and Criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20

Department of Education Order No. 39, s. 2016 – Adoption of the Basic Education Research Agenda. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2016/06/10/do-39-s-2016-adoption-of-the-basic- education-research-agenda/

Devlin, S., Healy. O., Leader, G., & Hughes, B.M. (2011). Comparison of behavioral

Intervention and sensory-integration Therapy in the treatment of challenging

behavior. J Autism Dev Disord, 41(10):1303-20. 10.1007/s10803-010-1149-x. PMID: 21161577.

Georgieva, D. (2021). Sensory-Integration Therapy in the Treatment of Aggressive Behavior in Children with Multiple Disabilities. International Conference on Innovations in Sciences and Education (Social Sciences). https://doi.org/10.12955/pss.v2.211

Granke, J. (2007). Doors of perception: sensory integration for Montessori Classrooms. NAMTA Journal, 32(1), 231–243. https://archivesdev.montessori-ami.org/do/10f070ab-af4d-4313- a76f-d1f7ee482613#page/4/mode/2up

Hoyt, J. (2018). Including Sensory Integration Materials in a Montessori Classroom to Improve Behavior Outcomes. University of Wisconsin River Falls. https://amshq.org/- /media/Files/AMSHQ/Research/Action-Research/Including-Sensory-Integration- Materials-in-a-Montessori-Classroom-to-Improve-Behavior-Outcomes. ashx

Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods (Vols. 1-0). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947

Noddings, A. (2017). When sensory sensitivity requires intervention: Assessment and treatment of sensory sensitive children. Montessori Life. https://amshq.org/AboutMontessori /Montessori-Articles/All-Articles/When-Sensory-Sensitivity-Requires-Intervention

Roberts, J. E., King-Thomas, L., & Boccia, M. L. (2007). Behavioral indexes of the efficacy of sensory integration therapy. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. PMID: 17944293 10.5014/ajot.61.5.555

Robles, A. O. & Acedo, E. M. (2019). Development and Validation of Educational Video Tutorials for 21st Century Secondary Learners. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(2). https://asianjournals.org/online/index.php/ajms/article/view/186

Smith, J., Weaver, L.L., & Fristad, M. A. (2014). A Systematic Review of Sensory Processing Interventions for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. SAGE Journals. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512221093786

Watsons Institute (2020). Sensory Input for Children with Special Needs. https://www.thewatsoninstitute.org/senory-input-for-children-with-specialneeds/

Published

2025-01-12

How to Cite

Guzman, S. B. B. . (2025). Development, validation, and utilization of localized sensory board for learners with special educational needs. Polaris Global Journal of Scholarly Research and Trends, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.58429/pgjsrt.v4n1a209

Issue

Section

Articles