Clarifying the Scope of NLP: Language Processing vs. Neuro-Linguistic Programming
Keywords:
Natural Language Processing, Language Processing, Neuro- Linguistic ProgrammingAbstract
The acronym “NLP” has come to represent two fundamentally distinct disciplines: Natural Language Processing (a computational subfield of Artificial Intelligence) and Neuro-Linguistic Programming (a psychological and therapeutic methodology). This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis aimed at resolving ambiguities surrounding the use of the term “NLP” in academic, clinical, and technological contexts. By examining definitions, methodologies, applications, and challenges, we delineate the separate paradigms these fields represent. We explore cutting-edge computational models such as BERT, GPT-3, and CASEml within NLP, juxtaposed with therapeutic tools like the Meta Model and anchoring techniques within NLP therapy. Case studies spanning medical informatics and clinical psychology underscore the efficacy of each domain, while highlighting the potential for confusion due to shared linguistic foundations. This study not only clarifies domain boundaries but also proposes research directions to mitigate terminological ambiguity and foster interdisciplinary collaboration.
Downloads
References
. Shatte ABR, Hutchinson DM, Teague SJ. Machine learning in mental health: a scoping review of methods and applications. Psychol Med 2019 Jul;49(9):1426-1448 1.
. Cohen AS, Mitchell KR, Elvevåg B. What do we really know about blunted vocal affect and alogia? A meta-analysis of objective assessments. Schizophr Res 2014 Nov;159(2-3):533-538 .
. T. Witkowski, “A review of research findings on neuro-linguistic programming,” Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 34–41, 2012.
. J. Passmore and T. S. Rowson, “Neuro-linguistic programming: A critical review of NLP research and the application of NLP in coaching,” International Coaching Psychology Review, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 41–52, 2019.
. Y. Kotera and D. Sheffield, “The applications of neuro‐linguistic programming in organizational settings: A systematic review of psychological outcomes,” Human Resource Development Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 101–116, 2019.
. R. Biswal and B. Prusty, “Trends in neuro-linguistic programming (NLP): A critical review,” Social Science International, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 200–209, 2011.
. P. Tosey and J. Mathison, “Neuro‐linguistic programming as an innovation in education and teaching,” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 317–326, 2010.
. A. Dowlen, “NLP—help or hype? Investigating the uses of neuro‐linguistic programming in management learning,” Career Development International, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27–34, 1996.
. Y. Purnama, B. Sobirov, and L. Ino, “Neuro-linguistic programming as an instructional strategy to enhance foreign language teaching,” Studies in Media and Communication, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 45–59, 2023.
. S. M. Seitova, G. O. Kozhasheva, and Y. N. Gavrilova, “Peculiarities of using neuro-linguistic programming techniques in teaching,” International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1077–1086, 2016.
. H. J. Hejase, M. I. Tartozi, and F. Hashem, “Neuro-linguistic programming and leadership: An exploratory study on Lebanese management,” European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 47–63, 2015.
. R. S. Nompo, A. Pragholapati, and A. L. Thome, “Effect of neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) on anxiety: A systematic literature review,” KnE Life Sciences, pp. 12–20, 2021.
. M. C. G. Anelo, “Metaphors and neuro-linguistic programming,” International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 99–111, 2010.
. B. Grimley, “Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) and coaching,” in Handbook of Coaching Psychology, Routledge, 2018, pp. 234–250.
. R. Sidhu, “Neuro-linguistic programming,” in Gower Handbook of People in Project Management, Routledge, 2016, pp. 487–496.
. A. M. B. Ismail and F. J. Al-Ajmi, “Neuro-linguistic programming and its relationship with psychological flexibility among secondary school students,” Qubahan Academic Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 18–29, 2024.
. M. H. Amirhosseini and H. Kazemian, “Automating the process of identifying the preferred representational system in Neuro Linguistic Programming using Natural Language Processing,” Cognitive Processing, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 465–474, 2019.
. S. Gran, “Using NLP methods in teaching and learning: Case studies on the potential and impact of NLP methods,” University of Duisburg-Essen Dissertation, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://duepublico2.uni-due.de
. F. M. M. Hassan, F. Binzafrah, and M. Alqahtani, “A structural framework for NLP and its consequence on leadership succession planning,” Sumy State University Repository, 2022.
. O. M. Maisenbacher, “Neuro-linguistic programming as a communication tool for management,” University of Johannesburg Graduate Research, 2013.
. T. Witkowski, “NLP: A final verdict,” Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 22–36, 2012.
. J. Passmore and T. S. Rowson, “What works in NLP? Methodological concerns in research,” International Coaching Psychology Review, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 41–52, 2019.
. Hays DG. Introduction to Computational Linguistics, Mathematical Linguistics and Automatic Language Processing. Cambridge: American Elsevier Publishing Co; 1967 .
. Manning CD, Schutze H. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge: MIT Press Ltd; 1999 .
. Harris ZS. Distributional Structure. WORD 2015 Dec 4;10(2-3):146-162 .
. Landauer TK, Foltz PW, Laham D. An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 1998 Jan;25(2-3):259-284 .
. Chollet F. Deep Learning with Python. Shelter Island: Manning Publications; 2017 .
. Sinnenberg L, Buttenheim AM, Padrez K, Mancheno C, Ungar L, Merchant RM. Twitter as a tool for health research: a systematic review. Am J Public Health 2017 Jan;107(1):e1-e8 1.
. Castro VM, Minnier J, Murphy SN, Kohane I, Churchill SE, Gainer G, International Cohort Collection for Bipolar Disorder Consortium. Validation of electronic health record phenotyping of bipolar disorder cases and controls. Am J Psychiatry 2015 Apr;172(4):363-372 .
. Carson NJ. Identification of suicidal behavior among psychiatrically hospitalized adolescents using natural language processing and machine learning of electronic health records. PLoS One 2019 Feb 19;14(2):01-14 .
. Bedi G, Carrillo F, Cecchi GA, Fernandez Slezak D, Sigman M, Mota NB, et al. Automated analysis of free speech predicts psychosis onset in high-risk youths. NPJ Schizophr 2015 Aug 26;1:15030 .
. Roy T, McClendon J, Hodges L. Analyzing Abusive Text Messages to Detect Digital Dating Abuse. In: IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics. 2018 Presented at: IEEE'18; March 2-3, 2018; New-York .
. Doan S, Ritchart A, Perry N, Chaparro JD, Conway M. How do you #relax when you're #stressed? A content analysis and infodemiology study of stress-related tweets. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2017 Jun 13;3(2):e35 .
. Luo SX, Shinall JA, Peterson BS, Gerber AJ. Semantic mapping reveals distinct patterns in descriptions of social relations in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res 2016 Aug;9(8):846-853 .
. Tanana M, Hallgren KA, Imel ZE, Atkins DC, Srikumar V. A comparison of natural language processing methods for automated coding of motivational interviewing. J Subst Abuse Treat 2016 Jun;65:43-50 .
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 awaz shaban, Ibrahim M. Ibrahim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
