Attorneys Awareness of Forensic Science: A Survey Conducted in Lebanon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58429/pgjsrt.v1n1a86Abstract
Forensics is the application of science to serve the law. Many forensic evidence types are used in the criminal justice system like DNA, toxicology, GSR, fingerprint, and firearm. To better implement forensic investigation procedures, the attorneys’ awareness of forensic science is vital. Thus, this study evaluates the level of awareness among Lebanese attorneys. A cross-sectional study was conducted with over 60 Lebanese lawyers of both genders residing in the five governorates. The survey questionnaire was well designed and carried on from May 2022 to October 2022 with an 83% as responsive rate. The participants’ characteristics were studied as well as their views and needs to investigate their relative association through an independent t-test. Accordingly, it revealed that the majority of the participants were unaware of forensic science notions. As to the participants’ features, results showed that there is a significant difference in technology advances awareness among participants who underwent past training and those who did not. However, there is no significant difference in the participants’ intention to participate in future trainings with 85% of the volunteers are willing to participate in future trainings. In addition, DNA evidence was picked as the preferred topic to be covered in the upcoming training due mainly to its high accuracy. Although this survey identified that Lebanese lawyers who accomplished past training were more aware of some forensics concepts, larger sample size is needed. Thus, it is very early to decisively predict the level of forensics awareness among Lebanese attorneys. In conclusion, training to increase Lebanese attorneys’ awareness regarding the importance of forensics is necessary.
Downloads
References
Amankwaa, A.O., & McCartney, C. (2018). The UK National DNA Database: Implementation of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Forensic Science International, 284, 117-128.
Bitzer, S., Margot, P., & Delemont, O. (2019). Is forensic science worth it? Policing, 13 (1), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pax058
Bridge, C., & Freeman, T.B. (2019). Appropriate education alters perceptions of forensic science and guides career selection. Journal of Forensic Science Education, 1.
Dhabal, S., Nandi, K., Sen, D., & Saha, D. et al. (2022). Ballistics: the projectile characteristics of weapon in forensic science. World Journal of Pharmaceutical and Life Sciences, 8(3), 263-278.
Divakar, K.P. (2017). Forensic Odontology: The New Dimension in Dental Analysis. International Journal of Biomedical Science , 13(1), 1–5.
Edmond, G. (2015). What lawyers should know about the forensic sciences. Adelaide Law Review, 36 (1).
Gamero, J., Romero, J.L., Peralta, J.L., Carvalho, M., & Corte-Real, F. (2007). Spanish public awareness regarding DNA profile databases in forensic genetics: what type of DNA profiles should be included? Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, 598-604.
Garrett, B. & Mitchell, G. (2016). Forensics and fallibility: Comparing the views of lawyers and jurors. West Virginia Law Review, 119.
Garrett, B., Gardner, B., Murphy, E., & Grimes, P. (2021). Judges and forensic science education: A national survey. Forensic Science International, 321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110714
Hall, A., Sims, L. M., & Ballantyne, J. (2014). Assessment of DNA damage induced by terrestrial UV irradiation of dried bloodstains: Forensic implications. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 8(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.06.010
Hamze, M., Saade, N., & Fawaz, F. (2016). Charter of ethics and guiding principles of scientific research in Lebanon. National Council for Scientific Research, July 15.
Hawkins, I. & Scherr, k. (2017). Engaging the CSI effect: The influences of experience-taking, type of evidence, and viewing frequency on juror decision-making. Journal of Criminal Justice, 49, 45-52.
Hennessy, L. K., Franklin, H., Li, Y., Buscaino, J., Chear, K., Gass, J., Mehendale, N., Williams, S., Jovanovich, S., Harris, D., Elliott, K., & Nielsen, W. (2013). Developmental validation studies on the RapidHITTM Human DNA Identification System. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series, 4(1), e7–e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2013.10.003
Kaushal, N. & Kaushal, P. (2011). Human identification and fingerprints: A review. Journal of Biometrics and Biostatistics, 2 (4).
Kessler, G.C. (2010). Judges' awareness, understanding, and application of digital evidence. Nova Southeastern University, Florida (Doctoral Dissertation).
Kloosterman, A., Mapes, A., Geradts, Z., van Eijk, E., Koper, C. , van den Berg, J., Verheij, S., van der Steen, M., & van Asten, A. (2015). The interface between forensic science and technology: how technology could cause a paradigm shift in the role of forensic institutes in the criminal justice system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 370 (1674). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0264
Ley, B., Jankowski, N., & Brewer, P. (2010). Investigating CSI: Portrayals of DNA testing on a forensic crime show and their potential effects. Public Understanding of Science, 21 (1), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510367571
McEwen, T., & Regoeczi, W. (2015). Forensic evidence in homicide investigations and prosecutions. Journal of Forensic Sscience, 60 (5).
Mishra, R.K., Jain, P., Anil, B., Mukesh, S., & Tiwari, R.S. (2020). Identification of GSR on the shooters hands using energy dispersive experiments. Journal of Forensic Research, 11 (3).
Peterson, J., Hickman, M., Strom, K., Johnson, D. (2012). Effect of forensic evidence on criminal justice case processing. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 58 (s1), 78-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12020
Regan, M. (2017). The complexity of evidence-based forensic interpretation. University College London (Masters Thesis).
Saferstein, R. (2006). Criminalistics: An introduction to forensic science. College 9th Edition.
Shen, M. & Vieira, D.N. (2016). Forensic science: defending justice. Forensic Sciences Research, 1(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2016.1243083
Smith, M.P. & Bluth, M.H. (2016). Forensic Toxicology: An Introduction. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, 36(4), 753–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2016.07.002
van Oorschot, R.A.H., Ballantyne, K.N., & Mitchell, R.J. (2010). Forensic trace DNA: A review. Investigative Genetics, 1(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-2223-1-14
Weiss, D., & Laporte, G. (2018). Uncertainity ahead: a shift how federal scientific experts can testify. National Institute of Justice, 279.
www.bba.org.lb Beirut Bar Association (2022).
www.turing.ac.uk Response to the house of lords inquiry: Forensic science in criminal justice (2018).
Yadav, P. (2017). Ethical Issues Across Different Fields of Forensic Science. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Science, 7 (1) 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-017-0010-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Dr. Paula Romanos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
